ROIComplications Ensue
Complications Ensue:
The Crafty Screenwriting, TV and Game Writing Blog




Archives

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

November 2015

December 2015

January 2016

February 2016

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

September 2017

October 2017

November 2017

December 2017

January 2018

March 2018

April 2018

June 2018

July 2018

October 2018

November 2018

December 2018

January 2019

February 2019

November 2019

February 2020

March 2020

April 2020

May 2020

August 2020

September 2020

October 2020

December 2020

January 2021

February 2021

March 2021

May 2021

June 2021

November 2021

December 2021

January 2022

February 2022

August 2022

September 2022

November 2022

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

July 2023

September 2023

November 2023

January 2024

February 2024

 

Friday, January 08, 2010

[Canadian Politics] Canadian Business has an article about Ontario's new tax credit for intellectual property development. Another "handout" to the arts? Here's the nugget at the end of the story:
As to the worthiness of film and TV in Ontario, Thorne-Stone has no doubt. She estimates Ontario sees an ROI of $10 to $12 for every $1 in tax-credit redemption.
For some reason, arts subsidies are tagged as handouts. But aside from whatever cultural value they have, they promote business. There is hardly a major industry in Canada that the government doesn't support, from logging to steel to cars. Why not promote the arts? You get your money back!

Which raises the question: why won't the Conservatives support the business of show business? Don't they want people to get rich?

Labels:

6 Comments:

Fight these idiots Canada. We let them run wild here in the States. Now the only people who get government funding are big banks!

By Blogger GoldenAgeofGeek, at 10:34 AM  

Great blog man. Love the Canadian perspective.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:59 PM  

I've often wondered the same thing. Last I checked, the Pennsylvania Film Office touted a $6 ROI on every $1 in incentives it provided, yet those funds are usually near the top of the chopping block when budget-cutting season comes around.

By Blogger Terry Hart, at 2:00 PM  

If $10 to $12 dollars is the ROI they pulled out of their nether regions for a perennial money losing operation like the arts... can you imagine how much more it would be if that dollar went to an actual money making endeavour like Walmart!

I wonder what kind of ROI would come from just leaving that $1 where it came from? Then again, the cost of paying and collecting tax means that it was probably more like $2 to wrangle that $1 from the taxpayer.

Hey, maybe if their taxes weren't so high, more people could afford to go out to a movie or pay to stream a TV show?

This is the same voodoo economics that NASA is continuously using to try and justify the money that they spend.

If I won't tow that line for expanding us into a space going civilization, the single most important thing that it is possible for the human race to do, I sure ain't going to do it to protect the entertainment industry.

Even if that is the industry I'm working in.

By Blogger Clint Johnson, at 7:14 PM  

Although... being a tax rebate... this is more along the lines of "leaving that $1 where it came from". An example of the government picking "winners" by allowing them to keep more of their money - rather than giving them more of other people's money.

Although they do plenty of that as well.

I still stand by my statement that "Return On Investment" is empty rhetoric when used outside a limited arena. You can't count how it effects the community at large because EVERY dollar spent does that. If I were to spend a million dollars on hookers and blow, it would have an enormous ROI base on those silly metrics.

The only time that a dollar's ROI can legitimately used is when trying to establish a specific investment's return to the person or business that spent that dollar.

Some in the arts actually have an ROI that is in the positive range while many more do not.

The answer is to let the weeds die out and make way so that those in the arts who can make a positive ROI don't have to fight for sunlight with them.

By Blogger Clint Johnson, at 7:43 PM  

Massive good catch, Alex. Thank god one of us is still reading.

By Blogger DMc, at 10:39 AM  

Post a Comment

Back to Complications Ensue main blog page.



This page is powered by Blogger.